Metrics – Driven Retrospectives

The Scrum methodology is driven by the Kaizen mindset, which refers to continual improvement. However, the success of the Kaizen mindset depends mostly upon Sprint Retrospectives. In this article we will discuss Metrics – Driven Retrospectives and their importance for a company’s success.

Metrics - Driven restrospectives - scrum metrics for remote teams, project management bot discord

What Are The Purposes of The Sprint Retrospectives?

Based upon the Scrum Guide 2020, the Sprint Retrospectives enhance quality and effectiveness in a process. These Sprint Retrospectives are also known as Metrics-Driven Retrospectives.

Classification of Metrics-Driven Retrospectives

Companies classify Metrics-driven retrospectives as:

  • Qualitative metrics.
  • Quantitative metrics.

The Qualitative Metrics

During the retrospectives, we can collect qualitative data by surveying the team members.  The Three Important Pillars of Data Collection and Empirical Process.

The three most important pillars that are the most important regarding data collection are:

  • Transparency
  • Inspection
  • Adaptation

What is Transparency?

For transparency, a psychology is for everyone to speak what is present in their minds. It starts by reviewing the progress made to the action items recognized in the previous retrospective and then discussing the success and failures of the past Sprint.

Metrics - Driven restrospectives - scrum metrics for remote teams, project management bots discord

What is Inspection?

Inspection comprises the leading causes of events that have occurred. We can count it by spending some time with the Scrum team and determining the cause of the events.

What is Adaptation?

Adaptation refers to the acceptance of changes for becoming truly agile. In adaptation, the aim is to walk out of the retrospective with actionable items to resolve significant issues and improve the work approach.

Do you want to improve your Scrum Metrics?

  Use Orli Scrum Bot for Discord!

The Quantitative Metrics

Just like qualitative metrics, companies can collect quantitative metrics during the Sprint. Among them, some of the commonest are:

  • Lead time
  • Cycle time
  • Number of escaped defects
  • Delivered features
  • Sprint velocity
  • Feature-bugs ratio
  • Committed features, and
  • Throughput, etc.

Metrics-Driven Retrospectives - Metrics for Scrum Teams for Self-Improvement

 Scrum metrics that teams should use for self-improvement are:

  • Throughput
  • Time-to-Market/Time-to-Value
  • Escaped Defects/Quality
  • Bug Created versus Bug Closed

Throughput

It is the number of finished product backlog items per product. It is comparatively better than the sprint velocity.

Time-to-Market/Time-to-Value

It is the length of the number of sprints before the release of the team to the end-users.

Escaped Defects/Quality

It is the representation of software faring in production. Scrum masters can facilitate this metric by defining a defect that is considered a bug-issue type.

Bug Created versus Bug Closed

It represents a bug created versus a bug closed in a sprint and all the cumulative values. This metric helps understand the code quality and attaches the Sprint team closely with the escaped defect metric. The bug created versus bug closed gives a complete view of the software quality.

The Sample SI Dashboard

With all team members having a real-time view of the metrics, they become an essential part of the everyday sprint retrospective reviews.

Continuous Improvement (CI) and Self-Improving (SI)

In Scrum, the ability to show continued improvement is critical. Therefore, the metrics to measure this Continuous Improvement (CI) are also essential. To become Self Improving (SI), the Scrum teams should own and drive the CI themselves.